睡眠机制知识库

帕金森病睡眠障碍各表型的药物治疗:随机对照试验的系统综述与荟萃分析

Pharmacological treatment of sleep disorder phenotypes in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

荟萃分析开放获取
作者
Canever JB, da Silva LC, Apio FS, Cimarosti HI
期刊
Journal of neurology
出处
2026; 273(10); 618
DOI
10.1007/s00415-026-14158-5
PMID
42782386

一句话摘要

检索六个数据库,按睡眠表型(日间过度嗜睡、睡眠质量差、失眠、REM 睡眠行为障碍)分层,对帕金森病睡眠障碍药物治疗的随机对照试验做系统综述与荟萃分析,评估各表型的疗效与安全性;结论认为时相药物与多巴胺受体激动剂可能改善总体睡眠质量(低确定性证据),而 EDS、失眠与 RBD 的证据不足以给出确定推荐。

为什么重要

把帕金森病睡眠障碍的药物证据按表型而非药物类别重组,回应了该领域证据碎片化、难以指导具体表型选择的问题。

英文摘要原文

Background Sleep disturbances are amongst the most prevalent and disabling non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), encompassing excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), poor sleep quality, insomnia, and REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD). The pharmacological evidence base remains fragmented across phenotypes, drug classes, and outcome instruments. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for sleep disorders in PD, stratified by sleep phenotype, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods Six databases were searched without restrictions. Eligible studies were RCTs in adults with PD and any sleep disturbance. Pooling was performed using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261412614). Results Twenty-nine RCTs (1913 participants; 2002 to 2025) were included. Only 17.2% of trials were at low overall risk of bias. For EDS (k = 6), the pooled ESS estimate was directionally favourable but non-significant (MD 1.75; 95% CI -0.26 to 3.75; I 2 = 91%), driven predominantly by a single influential crossover trial. For overall sleep quality (k = 6), pharmacological treatment produced a statistically significant improvement in PSQI scores (MD 2.66; 95% CI 1.63 to 3.69; I 2 = 71%). For insomnia symptoms (k = 3) and RBD (k = 2), pooled estimates were non-significant with high heterogeneity (I 2 = 96% and 99%, respectively), precluding reliable conclusions. Given this level of heterogeneity (I 2 > 90%), pooled estimates for these two domains, as well as for EDS, are presented as exploratory only and narrative synthesis is emphasised over meta-analytic pooling. No unexpected safety signals were identified, although safety reporting was heterogeneous and quantitative pooling was not performed. Conclusions Pharmacological treatment, particularly with chronobiotic agents and dopaminergic receptor agonists, may produce improvement in overall sleep quality (low-certainty evidence). Evidence for EDS, insomnia symptoms, and RBD remains insufficient for definitive recommendations, and pooled estimates in these domains should not be over-interpreted given their very high statistical heterogeneity. Phenotype-specific RCTs with harmonised outcome measures are needed.

所属章节

睡眠障碍病理生理

帕金森病 药物治疗 随机对照试验 荟萃分析

条目编号 P127 · 元数据经 Crossref / Europe PMC 回查